NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M4100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+1102%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP
(216-0842009)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
