NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+1187%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
