NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+702%
8.253 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
