Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1612MHz vs 1215MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +73%
14.31 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
46
2560
Shading Units
5888
80
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
184
20
RT Cores
46
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
17.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net