NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (2525MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
+448%
45.25 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
Radeon PRO W7800
+30%
2602
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi(Navi III Series)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1895 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
2525 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
70
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
4480
80
TMUs
280
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
70
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
323.2 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
90.50 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.25 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
57.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
