NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1612MHz vs 1455MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+62%
13.41 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+46%
2937
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
271
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
+30%
355
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1275 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
72
2560
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
576
20
RT Cores
72
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
