NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+615%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2028%
2001
Quadro K4000M
94
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1255%
271
Quadro K4000M
20
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
960
80
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
