NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+8236%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.314 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
