NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 62W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1619%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.17 billion
Unknown
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
