NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+1342%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
