NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+5147%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.505 billion
Unknown
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
