Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1627MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +686%
52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
1024
16
RT Cores
128
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
100 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net