NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1627MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+65%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
96
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
