NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (2505MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
17792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+8223%
91.06 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
6
18176
Shading Units
384
568
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
TU117
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
