NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2505MHz vs 2040MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2806%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
32bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
768
568
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
12
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Navi 24
AD102
GPU Variant
Navi 24
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
