Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jul 2005
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
-
568
TMUs
12
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
NV41
AD102
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
130 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
83W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy