Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +270%
91.06 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
8192
568
TMUs
512
192
ROPs
512
568
Tensor Cores
128
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
450W
700 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net