Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +18990%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
192
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
28
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy