NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
18080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+35331%
91.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+6103%
26240
GeForce GT 240
423
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
12
18176
Shading Units
96
568
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
69W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT215
AD102
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
