NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S10000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 164% (2505MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2574%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000
3.405 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+1205%
26240
FirePro S10000
2010
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+1116%
12629
FirePro S10000
1038
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1792
568
TMUs
112
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD102
GPU Variant
Zaphod
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
