NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2505MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2515%
91.06 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+688%
26240
Arc Pro A40
3328
OctaneBench
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+159%
1068
Arc Pro A40
411
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1024
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
