NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation
+1880%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
768
304
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
