NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 98% (1680MHz vs 850MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation
+4913%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
0.652 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Mars
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
