NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon E8950
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1680MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+698%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2048
304
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
E8950
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
