NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 122% (1680MHz vs 758MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
8384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+1504%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M
2.038 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1344
304
TMUs
112
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
