NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1680MHz vs 1445MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
8320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+703%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300M
4.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1408
304
TMUs
88
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
