NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+4378%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
0.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.40 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
729.6 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
