NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W7170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7170M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1004%
32.69 TFLOPS
FirePro W7170M
2.961 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
2048
304
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
5 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
