NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2550MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2312%
65.28 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+577%
14170
RTX A400
2091
3DMark Speed Way
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2001%
6473
RTX A400
308
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
6
12800
Shading Units
768
400
TMUs
24
176
ROPs
16
400
Tensor Cores
24
100
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GA107
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
