NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
12752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+65180%
65.28 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
1
12800
Shading Units
48
400
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
