NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Moore Threads MTT S1000M
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+3087%
65.28 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jul 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
1024
400
TMUs
64
176
ROPs
64
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
64.00 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.048 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
