NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
12704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+24167%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
2
12800
Shading Units
96
400
TMUs
16
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
49W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF108
AD102
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
