NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
12728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+34623%
65.28 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Feb 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
9
12800
Shading Units
72
400
TMUs
24
176
ROPs
8
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT215
AD102
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
