Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +4471%
65.28 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

100
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
12800
Shading Units
768
400
TMUs
48
176
ROPs
16
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Bonaire
AD102
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy