NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
11200 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2372%
65.28 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
1600
400
TMUs
80
176
ROPs
32
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cypress
AD102
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
