NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
-
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
-
400
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
400
Tensor Cores
-
100
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV380
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
