NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2550MHz vs 2050MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+677%
65.28 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
8.397 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+91%
14170
Arc Pro A60
7385
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+250%
12700
Arc Pro A60
3623
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2023
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
2048
400
TMUs
128
176
ROPs
64
400
Tensor Cores
256
100
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-256
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
