NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2550MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2025%
65.28 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+337%
14170
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+757%
12700
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1155 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2550 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
100
SM Count
-
12800
Shading Units
768
400
TMUs
48
176
ROPs
24
400
Tensor Cores
96
100
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
448.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
1020 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
65.28 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
1020 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG2-128
AD102
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
