Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 224% (2025MHz vs 625MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +936%
8.294 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
575 MHz
2025 MHz
Boost Clock
625 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2048
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
8.294 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
129.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Venus
-
GPU Variant
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy