NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1746MHz vs 1165MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+181%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Apr 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
2048
240
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GM204
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
