NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+4848%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+7551%
10406
Quadro 410
136
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
38W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GK107
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
