Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +3893%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy