Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 280.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +73%
19.17 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
160bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
6144
192
TMUs
192
80
ROPs
96
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
350W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy