NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (2250MHz vs 2175MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 360.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 12GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+16%
26.73 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
48
5120
Shading Units
6144
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
192
40
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
