NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+302%
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
144
64
ROPs
32
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
