NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+181%
23.04 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.0
