NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA H100 SXM5 94 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 94GB VRAM H100 SXM5 94 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2250MHz vs 1980MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 700W)
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 94 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (94GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3.36TB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
H100 SXM5 94 GB
+190%
66.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
94GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3.36TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
132
5120
Shading Units
16896
160
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
528
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
700W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GH100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
80 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
