NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (100W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2520MHz vs 2250MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090
+258%
82.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
128
5120
Shading Units
16384
160
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
176
160
Tensor Cores
512
40
RT Cores
128
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
450W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
