NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+5451%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
3
5120
Shading Units
144
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
