NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+7308%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
96
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
